Why Does Trump Place Trust in Female Advisors?

Despite persistent claims that President Donald Trump is sexist, a closer look at his trusted advisors and the dynamics within his administration reveals a more nuanced picture. This article will explore the context behind why Trump continues to place trust in his female colleagues, including Kellyanne Conway, Sarah Huckabee Sanders, and Ivanka Trump.

Defining Sexism

Sexism is defined by the Google Dictionary as “relating to or characterized by prejudice, stereotyping, or discrimination typically against women on the basis of sex.” However, the assertion that President Trump is sexist based on his working relationships with women does not fully capture his approach to leadership and policy-making.

A Better Understanding of Trust

Being 'sexist' and trusting women to handle certain tasks or roles are two entirely different concepts. It is important to differentiate between using someone for personal gain and valuing them as equals. When it comes to trust, President Trump demonstrates a combination of strategic and personal motivations.

President Trump has a long history of hiring and promoting women in his organization, including in traditionally male-dominated roles. In the construction industry, where he ran the Trump Organization, it was rare to see women in management positions. This demonstrates a more complex understanding of leadership than mere sexism.

Personal Dynamics vs. Professional Trust

Psychological and behavioral theories suggest that leaders often surround themselves with individuals who reinforce their self-image and provide a sense of control. This does not necessarily indicate sexism, but rather a strategic choice to build a cohesive and competent team. President Trump appears to value the loyalty and support of women like Kellyanne Conway and Sarah Huckabee Sanders, but this does not mean he necessarily views them as equal partners in all aspects of decision-making.

The Role of Personal Relationships

Personal relationships play a significant role in presidential administrations. These relationships can be both professional and personal. For instance, Ivanka Trump's position in the White House has been a subject of scrutiny. Critics argue that she lacks the necessary credentials for an advisory role, and her relationship with her father has been described as 'creepy.' However, President Trump's trust in Ivanka likely stems from a different kind of relationship; one where he feels comfortable and supported, rather than one based on gender discrimination.

Comparing Trust to Racism and Anti-Semitism

It is often dismissed when someone says they cannot be racist because they have a black friend, or they cannot be anti-Semitic because they have a Jewish friend. Similarly, the assertion that President Trump cannot be sexist because he trusts and surrounds himself with women is also flawed. The key difference lies in the motive behind these relationships; obsessing over control rather than valuing the true capabilities of others.

Conclusion

In conclusion, understanding the context of President Trump's trust in his female advisors reveals a more nuanced picture than simply labeling him as sexist. His approach to leadership often incorporates strategic choices and personal relationships, both of which do not necessarily reflect gender discrimination. By focusing on a balanced and informed perspective, we can gain a better understanding of the complexities of modern leadership and policy-making.